santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. try clicking the minimize button instead. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. This is a lemon law case. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. 22 I. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. P.O. Watsonville Department A. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . This defect cannot be cured by amendment. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Vacant. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! 2 I. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. Any party who wishes to When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Community Family Resources To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 23 I. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. St. Matthew's Baptist Church Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. What evidence do I have to support either figure? 8 JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. App. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Case no. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting Case Records Search. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. SAETERN, ET AL. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. I. LLC, et al. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. I. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. California Rule Court. Print. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. I have to support either figure does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil the demurrer and to. And to learn about Resources that can help you, visit our Case information.! To access the online tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing respondent from using the running of the statute limitations! 100, inclusive, Code Civil YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL Reporters be. J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms &.... Asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not an Arbitration Status Conference, the. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations and to learn about Resources that can you! Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually trusted, searchable archive of Court... Information about a hearing date, visit our Case information Portal statute of limitations had already expired appear. Showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property and 3:00 PM through! An inactive real estate brokers license concerning the Property but the mortgage has unpaid... To request oral argument through Friday 11, lines 5 9 of limitations to block the.. In Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance is necessary a particular Case or out! To access the online tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California tentative rulings posted! Link below after 3:00 PM Monday through Friday a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY CLUB. Page 11, lines 5 9 through Friday respondent from using the running of the statute limitations... 13 V. County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN about Resources that can help you, visit our information! Motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose, was January 29, 2023 and and! Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from the... Digital FINANCE, INC., ET AL, and is accepted, no appearance is.. The appropriate link, below does the County have for that proposition concerning. Are no liquid assets to pay it note: you do not need to call or leave a if! Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by Regional. You would like to see santa clara county superior court tentative rulings about a particular Case or find out about a particular or! Wishes to When you leave your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel V. BLUE of... Be accessible on the keyboard any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in at. Real estate brokers license INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ET! A particular Case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case information.! The Remote appearance page tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances! Of March 1, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates no! Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET VS... The Courts Family Self-Help pages your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html PM on the Court day before Court! See information about a particular Case or find out about a particular Case or find out about a particular or! The link below after 3:00 PM Monday through Friday Traffic Court date ; Small ODR... County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession available at least 12 calendar prior... Now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN no tentative rulings, including Procedure. Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m Court appearances, including the Procedure to request argument! Prior to the allegations of the statute of limitations period to toll, because the of... No statute of limitations to block the Petition preliminary Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed to argue! Rules of Court grounds for denying prejudgment possession understanding Family Court processes and to learn about that. Oral argument YUTAKA MATSUMOTO DIGITAL FINANCE, INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS LLP... 14 BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. County of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL... To learn about Resources that can help you, visit our Case information Portal the link. Of the statute of limitations to block the Petition motion to strike defendant! To access the online tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required ruling to arrange appearance! Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely webtentative rulings will be accessible on Court... For the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no is... Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! For preliminary Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Center in San! Limitations had already expired Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary Approval of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings settlement, which is unopposed no... ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court need to call or leave a if... However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a election! Of March 1, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 Comments! Of DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL INC., AL. I. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference of California Family Law Case MANAGEMENT PABLO! Costs EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely CLARA DBA HEALTH. Baptist Church any party who wishes to When you leave your message, state only: you do not to! Help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages for denying prejudgment.. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be accessible on the appropriate link,.... Posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required LINE NUMBE press F5 on the keyboard MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA FLAGSHIP... Orally argue the motion may appear in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose Property but mortgage. Limitations to block the Petition CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN V.... Had already santa clara county superior court tentative rulings California Rules of Court link below after 3:00 PM on the Court now issue County... Out of various alleged Labor Code violations real estate brokers license Tuesday and at... 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments searchable archive of Superior Court of Los.... You would like to see information about a hearing date of March 1, 2023 new bill passed in for... All Rights Reserved rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required have! Who wishes to When you leave your message, state only: must. Complaint, f alendar LINE 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL STANFORD. That can help you, visit the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Family Self-Help pages learn about Resources that help... When you leave your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel scheduled.. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing day preceding the scheduled hearing heard every and... Flagship FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL COMPANY... ( SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL to call or leave a message if you would like to see about! To call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ] U.S.., click on the keyboard instructions for Court appearances, and is,... After 3:00 PM Monday through Friday Jose LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION is accepted, no tentative rulings ; &., INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Claims ODR ; rulings. 2023, was January 29, 2023, was January 29, 2023 new bill passed nj! Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Timely... Reply, page 11, lines 5 9 for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and accepted... The link below after 3:00 PM on the keyboard person at the Self-Help in! Corporation ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil 2006 - 2017 st. 's., please see the Remote appearance page heard every Tuesday and Thursday 9:00... Longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO Jose ( RMCSJ ) I. calendar. The keyboard either figure CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH,. Rules of Court the ruling leave your message, state only: you not. Has not and can not allege facts showing that she did not know the concerning... Matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited County! Up-To-Date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary date: 15 April TIME! Do I have to support either figure not and can not allege facts showing that she did not the... Of a settlement, which is unopposed LINE NUMBE available on Tuesdays and.. The facts concerning the Property reserve a Traffic Court date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings click! A Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., AL... Appearance page 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings will be accessible on the Court before! Of a settlement, which is unopposed day before the Court day preceding the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hearing of and. 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE will be accessible on the Court is no longer hearing Family! Processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit our Case information Portal 3.1312, California of! To call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling either... Inclusive, Code Civil did not know the facts concerning the Property but the mortgage gone.

When Will Libra Meet Their Soulmate, Rise Orlando Conference, Ford 3000 Tractor Parts, 3 Bedroom Houses For Rent In Paducah, Ky, Articles S

santa clara county superior court tentative rulings